Soil Landscape Classification

What This Tool Does

Soil Landscape Classification classifies a DEM into Pennock-inspired landform units using multiscale terrain analysis. It returns a landform raster, an optional polygon layer, a summary JSON, and an HTML report.

Typical Questions This Tool Helps Answer

  • Which landform positions dominate this field (summit, backslope, footslope, depression), and how do their typical erosion, leaching, and moisture characteristics inform site-specific management decisions?
  • Which terrain positions show convergent or depressional characteristics that signal moisture accumulation or elevated compaction vulnerability?
  • Are the predicted soil landscape classes consistent with existing field observations and available soil survey records?

When To Use

  • Soil survey preparation
  • Terrain-based land management planning
  • Identifying convergent and depositional terrain positions
  • Building a simple landform map from a DEM

What You Need

InputDescription
DEM rasterThe elevation raster to classify.

Key Settings

SettingDefaultGuidance
flat_slope_threshold3.0Higher values make more terrain count as flat.
fine_scale2.0Smaller values preserve more local terrain detail.
coarse_scale8.0Larger values emphasize broader landform patterns.
pedology_regionnoneUse a regional calibration pack when the landscape matches a supported setting.

What You Get

DeliverableFormatDescription
landform_unitsRasterLandform class map.
multiscale_signatureRasterThree-band diagnostic raster.
landform_polygonsVectorOptional polygon layer.
summaryJSONRun statistics and interpretation guidance.
html_reportHTMLHuman-readable report.

The summary also includes dominant_class_code, dominant_class_name, and class_distribution entries with confidence ranges for each class.

It also includes:

  • output_semantics
  • confidence_contract
  • interpretation_warnings

Runtime Output Keys

result.outputs["landform_units"]
result.outputs["multiscale_signature"]
result.outputs["landform_polygons"]
result.outputs["summary"]
result.outputs["html_report"]
result.outputs["path"]

Common Questions

Q: Which output should agronomy teams review first? A: Start with summary.dominant_class_name plus class confidence ranges in summary.class_distribution, then verify map patterns in landform_units.

Q: What is a common interpretation mistake? A: Treating class boundaries as hard soil boundaries; transition zones with low confidence need field checks.

Q: Which settings most change class distribution? A: profile_curvature_threshold, plan_curvature_threshold, fine_scale, and coarse_scale usually produce the largest redistribution.

Q: How should teams use these outputs operationally? A: Use landform_polygons to plan sampling zones and target lower-confidence areas for pedology verification.

Results Delivery Checklist

  • summary["valid_cells"] is non-zero
  • summary["dominant_class_name"] matches the expected terrain setting
  • class_distribution looks plausible for the study area
  • If requested, landform_polygons was created and opens correctly in GIS software
  • The report was reviewed before delivery

Operational Notes

  • Curvature thresholds and smoothing scales are the most sensitive controls; keep them fixed when comparing fields or seasons.
  • Use confidence ranges from class_distribution to prioritize field checks in transitional terrain.
  • Treat mapped class boundaries as guidance for sampling and management zoning, not hard pedologic boundaries.
  • yield_data_conditioning_and_qa
  • precision_ag_yield_zone_intelligence
  • precision_irrigation_optimization

References

  • Runtime implementation: wbtools_pro/src/tools/geomorphometry/soil_landscape_classification.rs
  • Precision Agriculture Intelligence bundle overview: manual/pro-tools-customer/src/precision_agriculture/overview.md

When To Use This Workflow

Use Soil Landscape Classification when you need terrain-informed soil-position units for sampling design and variable-rate agronomic planning.